The impact of rhythm, intonation, and stress on B1 adult english as a foreign language learners’ communicative competence development
PDF
EPUB

Keywords

Fonética; fonologia; fala; educação; compreensão. Fonética; Fonología; Discurso; Educación; Comprensión. Phonetics; Phonology; Speech; Education; Comprehension.

How to Cite

Sánchez Rodríguez, J. A., & Albán Neira, L. (2025). The impact of rhythm, intonation, and stress on B1 adult english as a foreign language learners’ communicative competence development. Pacha. Revista De Estudios Contemporáneos Del Sur Global, 6(18), e250417. https://doi.org/10.46652/pacha.v6i18.417

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the influence of rhythm, intonation, and stress on the communicative competence of B1 adult English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners at the Language Center of the Catholic University of Cuenca, Ecuador. Likewise, it aims to understand how these three prosodic features affect learners’ fluency and comprehension, addressing two primary questions: the overall role of prosodic features in EFL learning and the specific challenges learners face in mastering them. A convergent parallel mixed-method design was employed, and data were collected from seventy-one EFL students and eleven university professors through structured surveys and semi-structured interviews. The findings reveal that these prosodic features help develop learners’ communicative competence, with intonation identified as the most challenging aspect to learn and master. This study stresses the need for integrating explicit and frequent prosodic instruction into EFL curricula to improve learners’ oral proficiency and sheds light on practical pedagogical strategies to address these challenges.

https://doi.org/10.46652/pacha.v6i18.417
PDF
EPUB

References

Abdulrahman, B. S. (2021). Investigating the impact of EFL students’ misuse of prosodic features on their face-to-face interactions from university instructors’ perspectives. UKH Journal of Social Sciences, 5(1), 50–64. https://doi.org/10.25079/ukhjss.v5n1y2021.pp50-64

Bu, Y., & Zhou, Z. (2021). A study of Chinese EFL learners’ problems with stress acquisition. System, 96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102392

Carley, P., & Mees, I. M. (2020). American English phonetics and pronunciation practice. Routledge.

Chomsky, N., & Halle, M. (1968). The sound pattern of English. MIT Press.

Council of Europe. (2020). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Language, Teaching, Assessment. Council of Europe.

Couper-Kuhlen, E., & Allerton, D. (1986). An Introduction to English Prosody (Forschung & Studium Anglistik 1). Journal of Phonetics, 15(4), 383–388. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0095-4470(19)30588-1

Cresswell, J. (2009). Research Design Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Method approaches. SAGE Publications.

Fikri, N. (2023). The study of language transfer in EFL students’ translation work. Jurnal Pendidikan Non Formal, 1(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.47134/jpn.v1i1.100

Gilbert, J. B., Levis, J. M., & Jenkins, J. (2001). The Phonology of English as an International Language. TESOL Quarterly, 35(3). https://doi.org/10.2307/3588037

Girsang, M. I., Sumbayak, D. M., & Muhammad Yusuf. (2021). Paralinguistic features in students’ speaking performance. LingPoet: Journal of Linguistics and Literary Research, 2(2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.32734/lingpoet.v2i2.4452

Hirst, D. (2024). Speech Prosody: From Acoustics to Interpretation. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40772-7

Jackson, C. N., & O’Brien, M. G. (2011). The Interaction between prosody and meaning in second language speech production. Die Unterrichtspraxis/Teaching German, 44(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-1221.2011.00087.x

Kothari, C. (2004). Research_Methodology Methods and Techniques. New Age International.

Lee, H.-Y., & Song, J. (2019). Evaluating Korean learners’ English rhythm proficiency with measures of sentence stress. Applied Psycholinguistics, 40(6), 1363–1376. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716419000298

Li, S. (2023). Intonation patterns of Chinese EFL learners and their correlation with holistic prosody ratings. Communications in Humanities Research, 11(1), 203–211. https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7064/11/20231424

Mohamed, E. (2017). EFL Teacher challenges in suprasegmental stress. Journal of Faculty of Education - Menofia University, 2, 2–22. https://doi.org/10.21608/muja.2017.108566

Munro, M. J., & Derwing, T. M. (2019). Collecting data in L2 pronunciation research. Proceedings of the 11th Pronunciation in Second Language Learning and Teaching Conference.

Roach, P. (2010). English phonetics and phonology: A practical course. Cambridge Univ. Press.

Šimá?ková, Š., & Podlipský, V. J. (2023). Online guided pronunciation practice helps adult EFL learners improve L2 prosody. Auc philologica, 2022(1), 115–129. https://doi.org/10.14712/24646830.2022.32

Sonia, B., & Lotfi, B. A. (2016). The importance of prosody in proper English pronunciation for EFL learners. Arab World English Journal, 7(2). http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2814804

Wang, Z., & Mao, Y. (2022). No prosody, no emotion: Affective prosody by Chinese EFL learners. The Journal of AsiaTEFL, 19(1), 125–140. https://doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2022.19.1.8.125

Ya??z, O., Kaya, F., & Ötügen, R. (2024). The effectiveness of L2 pronunciation instruction: A critical systematic review of the intervention studies. The Literacy Trek, 10(1), 21–41. https://doi.org/10.47216/literacytrek.1487243

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2025 Javier Andrés Sánchez Rodríguez, Lorena Albán Neira

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...