Green gentrification and commodification of Protected Natural Areas in the metropolitan area of the city of Querétaro
Dossier | Feminist Epistemologies of the South: Production, transmission and management of knowledge and wisdom
PDF (Español (España))
EPUB (Español (España))

Keywords

Green gentrification; protected natural areas; urban expansion; environmental regulatory frameworks. Gentrificación verde; áreas naturales protegidas, expansión urbana, marcos regulatorios ambientales. Gentrificação verde; áreas naturais protegidas, expansão urbana, marcos regulatórios ambientais.

How to Cite

Bonfil Jiménez, Úrsula, & Ribeiro Palacios, M. (2022). Green gentrification and commodification of Protected Natural Areas in the metropolitan area of the city of Querétaro. Pacha. Revista De Estudios Contemporáneos Del Sur Global, 3(9), e210147. https://doi.org/10.46652/pacha.v3i9.147

Abstract

In the last 25 years, small and medium-sized cities on the global south have experienced an accelerated metropolitan growth. This territorial expansion in peri-urban areas has promoted a new model of real estate development linked to nature and upper classes. Thereby protected natural areas (PAs) located on the outskirts get into a market logic, contributing to the concentration value around them. In this scenario, we need to understand the role of the landscape planning tools in the consolidation of certain real estate developments and the spatial segregation processes around the PAs. We present the case of the Metropolitan zone of Queretaro city located in central Mexico. Based on qualitative methods we identified contradictions on the materialization of the instruments for the territorial regulation and urban planning, linked to the Pas, the advertising discourses for the new real estate projects around the Pas and the territorial reconfiguration and green gentrification that is triggered by the arrival of new residential developments on the lands surrounding the PAs. We noticed that the decision making about landscape planning and urban planning is centered on the local authorities, which allows some institutional arrangements favoring the PAs commercialization. The real estate companies have created a speech where the PAs are conceived as immovable property, meant for the people who have the capacity of paying for their own enjoyment, at expenses of the rural population who used to live there.

https://doi.org/10.46652/pacha.v3i9.147
PDF (Español (España))
EPUB (Español (España))

References

Angel, S., Blei, A., Parent, J., Lamson-Hall, P., Galarza, N., Civco, D. L., Qian, R., & Thom, K. (2016). Atlas of Urban Expansion Volume 1: Areas and Densities. New York University, UN-Habitat and Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.

Amorim, A., Calcagni, F., Timothy, J., Anguelovski, I., & Langemeyer, J. (2020). Hidden drivers of social injustice: uncovering unequal cultural ecosystem services behind green gentrification. Environmental Science and Policy, 112, 254-263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.05.021

Anders, S., & Gerda, W. (2010). Reaping nature’s dividends: The neoliberalization and gentrification of nature on the Oak Ridges Moraine. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 12(1), 41-57. https://doi.org/10.1080/15239080903371915

Anguelovski, I., Connolly, J., Garcia-Lamarca, M., Cole., & Pearsall, H. (2018). New Scholarly Pathways on Green Gentrification: What Does the ‘Green Turn’ Mean and Where is it Going? Progress in Human Geography, 43(6), 1064-1086. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132518803799

Calderón, R. (2016). El rol de las áreas naturales periurbanas para la resiliencia al cambio climático de las metrópolis el caso de la Ciudad de México. Revista Iberoamericana de Economía Ecológica, 25, 69-79. https://raco.cat/index.php/Revibec/article/view/310591

Calderón, A., Soto, L., y Estrada, E. (2012). Entre la conservación del bosque y el crecimiento de la ciudad: las localidades rurales en el espacio periurbano del Huitepec en San Cristóbal de Las Casas, Chiapas, México. Estudios Demográficos y Urbanos, 27(3), 739-787. https://doi.org/10.24201/edu.v27i3.1426

Campello, P., Tubino, D., Lucena, V., & Roberto-Jacobi, P. (2021). Green gentrification and contemporary capitalist production of space: notes from Brazil. Cahiers des Amériques Latines, 97, 185-210. https://doi.org/10.4000/cal.13550

Código Urbano del Estado de Querétaro. (2012). Poder Legislativo del Estado de Querétaro. http://legislaturaqueretaro.gob.mx/app/uploads/2016/01/COD005_59_18.pdf

Duering, E., y González, C. (2012, noviembre 16). Entre la conservación y la innovación en los Centros urbanos de Querétaro [Ponencia en extenso]. Segundo coloquio de la Red de Estudios sobre los Centros Históricos, Puebla, México. https://acortar.link/vycqe7

Gaceta Oficial del Municipio de Querétaro. (2015). Plan Municipal de desarrollo urbano del municipio de Querétaro. https://acortar.link/jpVGWy

Girault, C. (2017). Between naturalness and urbanity, how are protected áreas integrated into cities? The case of Helsinki (Finland). Journal of Urban Research, 16. https://doi.org/10.4000/articulo.3270

Haila, Y. (2012). Genealogy of nature conservation: a political perspective. Nature conservation, 1, 27-52. https://doi.org/10.3897/natureconservation.1.2107

Harper, E. (2019). Ecological Gentrification in Response to Apocalyptic Narratives of Climate Change: The production of an Immuno-political Fantasy. International Journal of urban and regional research, 44(1), 55-71 https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12842

Laslaz, L. (Ed.). (2012). Atlas mondial des espaces protégés. Les sociétés face à la nature. Autrement.

Laslaz, L., Gaucho, C., Duval, M., & Héritier, S. (Eds.). (2014). Les espaces protégés. Entre conflits et acceptation. Belin.

Ley General de Asentamientos Humanos, Ordenamiento Territorial y Desarrollo Urbano. (2021, junio 1). Diario Oficial de la Federación. https://www.diputados.gob.mx/LeyesBiblio/ref/lgahotdu.htm

Ley General del Equilibrio Ecológico y la Protección al Ambiente. (2022, abril 11). Diario Oficial de la Federación. https://www.diputados.gob.mx/LeyesBiblio/ref/lgeepa.htm

Mattioli, D. (2019). Lo común en cuestión: breve reflexión sobre las transformaciones espaciales contemporáneas en las sierras de Córdoba. Vivienda y ciudad, (6), 1-13. https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/ReViyCi/article/view/27356

Mcdonald, R., Forman, R., Kareiva, P., Neugarten, R., Salzer, D., & Fisher, J. (2009). Urban effects, distance, and protected areas in an urbanizing world. Landscape and Urban Planning, 93, 63-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2009.06.002

McDonogh, G., Isenhour, C., & Checker, M. (2011). Introduction: Sustainability in the city: Ethnographic approaches. City and Society, 23(2), 113–116. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-744X.2011.01057.x

Millennium Ecosystem Assessment [MEA]. (2005). Ecosystems and Human Wellbeing. Island Press.

Metenier, M. (2017, Jun). Facing rural gentrification in protected areas of England: the community land trusts as actors of rural change. European Rural Geographies Conference, Braunschweig, Germany. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01870991

ONU-Hábitat. (2016). Urbanization and Development: Emerging Futures. https://unhabitat.org/un-habitat-launches-the-world-cities-report-2016/

ONU-Hábitat. (2018). Q500 Queretaro. http://implanqueretaro.gob.mx/im/

q500/5/1/Q500-VersionCompleta.pdf.

ONU-Hábitat. (2020). Global State of Metropolis 2020 – Population Data Booklet. https://acortar.link/vNqZB3

Plan Nacional de Desarrollo Urbano 2014-2018 del Gobierno de México. (2014). Diario oficial de la federación el 30 de abril de 2014. https://acortar.link/LxevlY

Programa de Ordenamiento Ecológico local del municipio de Corregidora CXLV. (2012). La Sombre de Arteaga CXLV, 2012.

Programa de Ordenamiento Ecológico local del municipio de El Marques. (2015). La Sombra de Arteaga CXLVIII, 2015.

Programa de Ordenamiento Ecológico local del municipio de Huimilpan. (2013). La Sombra de Arteaga CXLVI, 2013.

Programa de Ordenamiento Ecológico local del municipio de Querétaro. (2014). La Sombra de Arteaga CXLVII, 2014.

Programa de Ordenamiento Ecológico Regional del Estado de Querétaro. (2009). Poder legislativo del Estado de Querétaro, 2009. https://acortar.link/Y99hoB

Puig, S. (2016). El periurbano, un espacio estratégico de oportunidad. Biblio3W Revista Bibliográfica de Geografía y Ciencias Sociales, 21(1.160). https://doi.org/10.1344/b3w.0.2016.26341

Quastel, N. (2009). Political ecologies of gentrification. Urban Geography, 30(7), 694-725. https://doi.org/10.2747/0272-3638.30.7.694

Ribeiro, M., Yañez, K., & Morales, C. (2021). Inequalities in the Quality and Governance of Urban, Publlic Green Spaces, Evidence from Deprived Neighborhoods in Querétaro, México. Environmental Justice, 14(1), 49-55. https://doi.org/10.1089/env.2020.0031

Tlapa, M., Bustamante, Á., Vargas, S., Ramírez, B., Cervantes, V., y Cruz, G. (2020). Factores del deterioro de las áreas naturales protegidas periurbanas del Valle de Puebla, México. Estudios Demográficos y Urbanos, 35(1), 51-82. https://doi.org/10.24201/edu.v35i1.1828

Wolch, J., Byrne, J., & Newell, J. (2014). Urban green space, public health, and environmental justice: The challenge of making cities ‘just green enough’. Landscape and urban planning, 125, 234-244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.01.017

Yamamoto, M. (2017). The Progress Population inflow and Rural Gentrification in Karuizawa on the Outskirts of the Tokyo Metropolitan Areas. Senshu University Institute of Humanities Monthly Bulletin, 285, 19-29. https://doi.org/10.34360/00007019

Yañez, K., Ribeiro-Palacios, M., & Morales, C. (2020). Governance and Policy Limitations for Sustainable Urban Land Planning. The Case of Mexico. Journal of Environmental Management, 259,109575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109575

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2022 Úrsula Bonfil Jiménez, Mónica Ribeiro Palacios

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...