Marxism and Subaltern Studies: The controversy over the failed universalization of Capital.
Marx, los marxismos y la cuestión colonial
PDF (Español (España))
EPUB (Español (España))

Keywords

Teoría Pos-colonial; Estudios Subalternos; marxismo; capitalismo; universalización. Post-colonial Theory; Subaltern Studies; Marxism; capitalism; universalization. Teoria pós-colonial; Estudos Subalternos; Marxismo; capitalismo; universalização.

How to Cite

Castaño García, C. C. (2022). Marxism and Subaltern Studies: The controversy over the failed universalization of Capital. Pacha. Revista De Estudios Contemporáneos Del Sur Global, 3(7), e21084. https://doi.org/10.46652/pacha.v3i7.84

Abstract

This article reviews the controversy initiated by the publication of the book Postcolonial Theory and the Specter of Capitalism (PTSC) by the North American sociologist Vivek Chibber, which deals with the analytical and political limitations of the Post-colonial Theory (TP), specifically of the Subaltern Studies (SS). A brief review of Chibber's argument will be made and the responses to his analysis will be presented, with special emphasis on the discussion about the relevance of Marxism and the concept of “capital’s universalization” proposed by Marx in the Grundrisse. It is concluded that the Marxian thesis of the universalization of capital must be understood as the globalization of the capitalist mode of production and that the historiography of capitalism must include the role of the global south in the conformation of capitalism with the purpose of leaving eurocentrism behind.

https://doi.org/10.46652/pacha.v3i7.84
PDF (Español (España))
EPUB (Español (España))

References

Ahmad, A. (1992). In Theory: Classes, Nations, Literatures. Verso.

Anievas, A., y Nisancioglu, K. (2017). Limits of the Universal: The Promises and Pitfalls of Postcolonial Theory and Its Critique. Brill. Historical Materialism, 25(3), 36-75. https://doi.org/10.1163/1569206X-12341539

Chakrabarty, D. (2005). A small history of Subaltern Studies. En H. Schwarz, & S. Ray (Eds.). A Companion to Postcolonial Studies (pp. 467-485). Blackwell Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470997024.ch25

Chakrabarty, D. (2008). Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference. Princeton University Press.

Chatterjee, P. (2013). Subaltern studies and capital. Economic and Political Weekly, 48(37), 69-75.

Chattopadhyaya, U. (26 de junio de 2014). Author’s Roundtable: Vivek Chibber, "Postcolonial Theory and the Specter of Capital" Response by Utathya Chattopadhyaya. Union for criticism. https://cutt.ly/fFggilk

Chibber, V. (2013). Postcolonial theory and the Specter of Capitalism. Verso.

Chibber, V. (25 de Febrero de 2014a). Subaltern Studies Revisited: Vivek Chibber's Response to Partha Chatterjee. Verso Books. https://www.versobooks.com/blogs/1529-subaltern-studies-revisited-vivek-chibber-s-response-to-partha-chatterjee

Chibber, V. (2014b). Confronting Postcolonial Theory. A response to critics. Journal of World-Systems Research, 20(2), 311-317. https://doi.org/10.5195/jwsr.2014.561

Chibber, V. (2014c). Making sense of postcolonial theory: a response to Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 27(3), 617-624. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2014.943593

Guha, R. (1997). Dominance Without Hegemony. Harvard University Press.

Heideman, P. (2 de mayo de 2013). Not Even Marxist? Paul M. Heideman examines Chris Taylor's critique of Vivek Chibber. Verso Books. https://cutt.ly/VFggqad

Kaiwar, V. (2004). Towards Orientalism and Nativism: The Impasse of Subaltern Studies. Review of Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference by Dipesh Chakrabarty and Dominance without Hegemony: History and Power in Colonial India by Ranajit Guha. Brill. Historical Materialism, 12(2), 189-247.

Kaiwar, V. (2014). The Postcolonial Orient: The Politics of Difference and the Project of Provincialising Europe. Brill.

Larsen, N. (2001). Determinations: Essays on Theory, Narrative and Nation in the Americas.Verso.

Lazarus, N., y Rashmi, V. (2008). Marxism and Postcolonial Studies. En J. Bidet y S. Kouvelakis (Eds). Critical Companion to Contemporary Marxism (pp. 309-332). Brill.

Marx, K. (2007). Grundrisse: Elementos fundamentales para la crítica de la economía política. Borrador 1857-1858. Siglo XXI.

Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1978). Acerca del colonialismo. Júcar.

Nilsen, A. (2017). Passages from Marxism to Postcolonialism: A Comment on Vivek Chibber’s Postcolonial Theory and the Specter of Capital. Critical Sociology 43(4–5), 559–571. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0896920515614982

Parry, B. (2004). Postcolonial Studies: A Materialist Critique. Routledge.

Seth, S. (2014). Review of Postcolonial Theory and the Spectre of Capital by Vivek Chibber. American Historical Review, 119(4), 1218–1220.

Sewell, W. H. (2014). On Vivek Chibber's Postcolonial Theory and the Specter of Capital. Journal of World-Systems Research, 22(1), 300-303.

Spivak, G. (2014). Postcolonial theory and the Specter of Capitalism. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 27(1), 184-198.

Taylor, C. (29 de abril de 2013). Not even Marxist. C.L.R James. http://clrjames.blogspot.no/2013/04/not-even-marxist-on-vivek-chibbers.html

Zapata, C. (2018). El giro decolonial. Consideraciones criticas desde América Latina. Pléyade, 21, 49-71. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0719-36962018000100049

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2022 Christian Camilo Castaño García

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...